Sarah Iliev vs Giulia Morlet Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 04 Mar at 07:05 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
S. Iliev vs G. Morlet

FRA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

FRA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Iliev 1 - 0 Morlet
They have played 2 sets in total, with Sarah Iliev winning 2 and Giulia Morlet winning 0. The last match between Sarah Iliev and Giulia Morlet was at the W15 Hagetmau, 04-03-2025, Round: R1, Surface: I.hard, with Sarah Iliev getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Iliev | 1 |
| Morlet | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) W15 Hagetmau(03-04-25)
S. Iliev vs G. Morlet H2H Profile
S. Iliev vs G. Morlet Match Preview:
Examining the recent performance on second serves reveals that Morlet has secured 35.65% of points in the last six months, slightly edging out Iliev, who stands at 34.67%. Historically, this statistic shows a strong correlation with match outcome predictions, indicating a closer contest between the two players.
The return game statistics present a clearer picture of player performance in recent form. Morlet has won 53.67% of points on their opponent's second serve, while Iliev has managed 50.56%. When it comes to first serve returns, Morlet again leads with 36.04% compared to Iliev's 34.51%. Such figures are useful for predicting who may be favored in upcoming matchups.
Under pressure, Iliev appears to have the upper hand by saving 50.38% of breakpoints compared to Morlet's 32.94%. Moreover, in terms of converting breakpoints, Iliev has succeeded in 49.14% of opportunities, more than Morlet's 42.31%. These stats may prove crucial for in-game betting decisions, particularly when either player faces a breakpoint.
Looking at their career win percentages on different surfaces, Morlet excels on hard courts with a 65% win rate, while their performance drops to 50% on indoor hard courts. Iliev's top performance is also on hard courts, boasting a 60% win rate, but their results diminish to 48% on clay surfaces.
In terms of competition level, Morlet has primarily competed in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K level in the past year, achieving a 75% win rate. In contrast, Iliev has been active in Challengers/ITF tournaments >$10K, maintaining a 51.72% win rate. The difference in competition levels can significantly impact head-to-head comparisons.
Regarding the quality of opponents, Morlet's average opponent ranking over the past year was 283.88, compared to Illev's 402.07, suggesting tougher competition for Morlet. Additionally, in deciding set scenarios, Morlet has emerged victorious in 60% of such matches over the previous year, whereas Iliev has a 40% success rate.
Considering all these factors, Morlet appears more likely to emerge victorious in this matchup, given their superior overall match win rate, performance against higher-ranked opponents, and past success in deciding sets.
Sarah Iliev vs Giulia Morlet Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
S. Iliev vs G. Morlet H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 6 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:4:59 | Average Match Time | 1:4:59 |
| 70% (28/40) | 1st Serve % | 58% (28/48) |
| 71% (20/28) | 1st Serve Win % | 50% (14/28) |
| 50% (6/12) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (9/20) |
| 57% (4/7) | Break Pts Won % | 67% (2/3) |
| 52% (25/48) | Return Points Win % | 35% (14/40) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
S. Iliev Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 6-1 6-4 | ||
R1 | W | 7-6(3) 6-4 | ||
R1 | L | 6-2 7-6(5) | ||
R2 | L | 6-2 6-3 | ||
R1 | W | 7-6(9) 4-6 6-3 | ||
G. Morlet Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 | L | 6-3 0-6 10-5 | ||
R1 | L | 6-3 6-4 | ||
Q3 | W | 7-6(2) 3-6 10-6 | ||
Q2 | W | 6-0 6-0 | ||
R1 | L | 6-2 6-4 | ||

S. Iliev vs G. Morlet Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55.35% (88/71) | YTD Win/Loss | 59.30% (51/35) |
| 53.99% (196/167) | Sets Win/Loss | 56.38% (106/82) |
| 51.83% (1741/1618) | Games Win/Loss | 54.38% (907/761) |
| 58.67% (44/31) | Hard Win/Loss | 62.50% (40/24) |
| 52.46% (32/29) | Clay Win/Loss | 52.94% (9/8) |
| 52.17% (12/11) | Indoor Hard W/L | 40.00% (2/3) |
| 0.07 | Aces Per Game | 0.09 |
| 119 | Aces Total | 74 |
| 0.28 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.43 |
| 454 | Total Double Faults | 346 |
| 1:17:10 | Average Match Time | 1:13:38 |
| 420.35 | Average Opponent Rank | 416.97 |
| 62% (5385/8754) | 1st Serve % | 57% (2220/3927) |
| 58% (3113/5385) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (1325/2220) |
| 44% (1474/3368) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (706/1707) |
| 49% (559/1137) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 51% (253/493) |
| 47% (4081/8673) | Return Points Win % | 48% (1788/3722) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50.00% (2/2) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 52.69% (49/44) | Challenger W/L | 0.00% (0/3) |
| 60.66% (37/24) | Futures W/L | 61.45% (51/32) |
| 54% (84/155) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (49/84) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 63% (19/30) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 62% (8/13) |
| 50% (23/46) | Deciding Set Win % | 61% (11/18) |
| 84% (81/68) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 92% (49/45) |
| 16% (81/13) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 8% (49/4) |
| 24% (78/19) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (37/5) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Kimberly Birrell vs Talia Gibson Prediction – WTA W75 Sydney – 22nd November 2025 Best Bets

Flavio Cobolli vs Zizou Bergs Prediction – ATP Davis Cup, World Group, SF, ITA – 21st November 2025 Best Bets

Oksana Selekhmeteva vs Jeline Vandromme Prediction – WTA W75 Petange – 21st November 2025 Best Bets

Maria Lourdes Carle vs Mayar Sherif Prediction – WTA LP Open by IND – 21st November 2025 Best Bets

Kimberly Birrell vs Ya-Yi Yang Prediction – WTA W75 Sydney – 21st November 2025 Best Bets
